“Women have to appropriate the language of men to get on in the world”

Genderlecturing

 So, the other day I was watching American TV and i saw a famous little man called Donald Trump, now, we all know who that is, but as he was arguing what he would do for the states of America, it reminded me of the many articles that are telling women around the globe that they can't use certain language because it's demeaning itself, surely that is a bit hypocritical? Personally, I think segregating genders through language is demeaning itself.

 Tabloids have been coming out all over the place and online articles have been 'just' storming the internet telling women about the app 'Just Not Sorry' which they should be using. 

 Now, apparently, this is because women have been using too much hedging in their emails and other pieces of writing, such as words like 'just', 'sorry' and 'actually' which are 'actually' demeaning because the woman has to apologise, justify and surprise herself with everything she writes.

 Lets be honest though, if you're not going to apologise for bothering someone you're a bit of an asshole anyway, but men do it too, in a recent investigation i did at my college, men tended to hesitate and use more politeness facework than women did, and they both seemed as polite as the other.

 When emailing a co-worker, using 'sorry' and 'just' would be appropriate anyway as doing this would make the author seem a lot more respectful of the receiver, even though it's not keeping up appearances and being assertive like a manager or boss should, it still would be nice if positive face acts weren't used constantly against you, you just wouldn't want to do it would you?

 If anything makes a difference to how you speak it would be the social background you were brought up in or the class you are, higher class people from a posh background are going to be polite and they will apologise and talk to you like a human being and a lower class person with a rude family background are more likely to take this on and be rude to you, making this statement to be a lot more about consensual status theory more than the deficit model.

 Whether you're male or female you should always be polite to people when asking for a favour as it's simply manners, and they don't cost a thing. 

 So the articles out there saying its 'just' not right to say 'sorry' can 'just' shove it, and I'm not 'actually' sorry, nobody should be judged for the way they speak or what they have between their legs. 

 I agree with Deborah Cameron and if you want to find out more about this situation, look her up and find out why women shouldn't demean their language so that they 'sound like men.'

Investigation into Genderlect- Taboo language and hesitation

Research on the Representation of Sexuality in the News

Manny Pacquiao apologises for comparing homosexuality to animals- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-3448981/Manny-Pacquiao-reveals-shocking-views-homosexuality-boxing-champion-claims-gay-couples-worse-animals.html (Leaving career and wants to be a politician). - The Daily Mail
Daily Mail writer uses homophobic slang in an article towards a bisexual MP- http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/10/15/did-the-daily-mail-really-just-compare-an-out-mp-to-ginger-beer/ - Pink News on the Daily Mail
The Daily Mail on gender issues- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3422060/Gender-madness-Trans-girl-Demi-boy-Inter-sex-Government-survey-asking-13-year-old-s-pick-25-genders-absurd-dangerous.html
The Daily Mail on Ella Giselle- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3480948/Caitlyn-Jenner-introduces-friend-Ella-resembles-Kim-Kardashian.html (Headline)

Analysis of the Representation of Power in the News

‘How are different genders and sexualities in Britain represented in the selection of articles found?’ 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3422060/Gender-madness-Trans-girl-Demi-boy-Inter-sex-Government-survey-asking-13-year-old-s-pick-25-genders-absurd-dangerous.html

 In this article by The Daily Mail, the author discusses their opinion on the added genders to the list of 'female' and 'male'. Some of the phrases and words used in this article express the authors negative opinion on this matter and clearly they do no want this extra list of genders to come out to the world and is trying to get the audience to disagree to the 25 genders possible. 

 According to this article, there is a new questionnaire being designed for young people (13-18 years old) to state their gender and whether they are comfortable using gendered toilets or whether they want unisex ones. The author: Damian Thompson, clearly does not agree with this as he states 'This sounds like the stuff of science fiction', almost comparing the people going on with this as aliens or 'abnormal', which is certainly discriminatory.

 By using phrases like 'science fiction', 'this is loopy feminist drivel' and 'infiltrated by a new generation of feminists', Thompson opposes this idea and tries to claim his power over these 'hardline feminists' by stating his qualifications in the article and by being the author of this newspaper article, he thinks he has power over this woman and this idea, but really, he's just ranting about his loss of power because his opinion is finally being opposed and being put forward to the new generation as wrong. 

 Of course it is wrong to label people and what they are, especially with derogatory words but when you aren't in your own body or you don't feel right, you feel you are something specific. You can't help what you are, so why is the sexuality of somebody more accepted than their gender? Because somebody is born some way doesn't mean they have to live like that forever, it's the same with sexuality, you may not realise it until later on in life, but just because you have one set of reproductive organs doesn't mean you have to live by them.

 Sometimes you have to think, no wonder people feel natural as other genders, feminists being looked down upon like this and the female gender is still being put down as the lower ground. On the other hand, males have people like Damian Thompson representing them, which isn't the most positive reinforcement of the male gender. 

 http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/10/15/did-the-daily-mail-really-just-compare-an-out-mp-to-ginger-beer/

Also, in The Daily Mail, other authors haven't been the most supportive of sexuality either, Quentin Letts also wrote in one of his articles, a derogatory slang phrase for queer/ gay: 'ginger beer', used to describe a bisexual MP who had come out in confidence to the public after divorcing his wife and being with a male.

 It's not just The Daily Mail either, celebrities around the world are having to keep apologising for their words towards homosexuals and other gendered people, for example, Manny Pacquiao had to apologise for comparing homosexual people to animals, seeing as they can determine one sex from another, so 'homosexuals are worse than animals'. Obviously, the human stereotype of animals is dirty and rough, so when compared to an animal, you can imagine how the public felt about this. It's understandable.

 In my opinion, I believe that same sex marriage shouldn't be called a civil partnership or even same sex marriage, it's just marriage, it's no different to any other marriage, so why does it need a label? I would also argue that The Daily Mail are incredibly biased and they seem to enjoy opposing human rights, only people like Donald Trump or Hitler would agree with this newspaper.

Magazine Adverts

Analysis of JCQ poster

JCQ Poster Analysis

 The graphology of this poster represents its power and authority over the reader mainly because of the big piece of branding at the top of the poster. This well known examination board company hold all their authority over everybody below them, seeing as they have the authority of bringing a student out of an exam and removing them from any future ones and can even press charges if any rules are broken. This is Deontic modality and instrumental power.

 Second of all, this poster uses repeated imagery in order to make sure that the ideology has been sent across. These are also to catch the eye of someone walking past or looking around and it also works from a distance, so someone across a room can see it. 

 The title in itself is showing its authority through its demeaning word choice. Using the buzzword 'warning; means that the students will automatically follow the orders of the poster as they have been warned to follow it. On top of this, the title even shows direct mode of address as it straight up says 'to candidates' pointing out its primary audience. The secondary audience is the group of teachers and exam leaders that will put the poster up and around the school and exam room, this is seen when you look at the bottom of the poster where it says 'copies of this poster must be displayed in a prominent place both inside and outside each examination room'.

 The text is set up into numerical values, a list with just numbers to divide them up, like a recipe. But then inside part 2, the text is set up into four bullet points as a subsection. This shows precise, formal and authoritative talk in the poster. 

 Finally, throughout the poster, there are words in bold. These words are modal verbs and it consists of 'must' and 'must not' mostly. These modal words show instrumental power over the reader and the person that this poster is targeted to, as this is what they have to do otherwise if they misbehave they get sanctioned and maybe even removed from the exam. This may cause the exam board to tell the other exam boards this, meaning that the student ruins everything with just one form of malpractice.

Analysis of Tesco Coupon

Tesco Coupon Analysis

 First of all, the most invasive way that this coupon exaggerates authority and power is through the repetition of the branding and the logo of Tesco itself. Especially considering the colour of the logo. The colouring of the logo is the only form of colour on the back of this coupon as the rest of the text is fully black and just a wall of text, rather than spread out. Finally, the logo is repeated three times, excessively big. Three is supposed to be the magic number within advertising, as if Tesco is marking their power and territory using this advertising convention. 

 The purpose of this text is to prevent the liability, to be precise, to protect the company, to be targeted at the customer and to be clear, meaning no complaints, and the way that this text does this is repeated throughout most coupons. This piece of text is here in fine print in order for the information to be there, but because the customers don't really care about it, they don't read it. But when something goes wrong, Tesco can always say that it was on the back of this coupon. This text is written in a way that it'll stop any confusion, much like a legal document, where everything has to be clear, and the style of writing and the language used in this proves that.

 The way this block of text is presented is in unconventional bullet points, as if it were a list or recipe, telling you what to do. Although it is visually unappealing, this block of text is designed to take up little space as to fit on the back of this coupon, fitting all the right information in.

 The language in this text is fairly simple as so the customer can understand it, there are few words to instruct the target audience and the sentences are shortened and simplified so they are quick to read and straight to the point. Finally, in the text there are a lot of modal verbs and imperative verbs, telling you what to do and the outcome of it, so the customer (demographic) can easily understand the instructions.